I was assuming the misogynistic stuff was consensual anyway.
Not sure whether to laugh or cry at this statement.
If you are saying someone has to provide a service they don't want to provide then should you force them? Should Barnes and Noble be required to provide any book/video etc... just because someone wants to purchase it from them? Lets use gay romance novels then. Should they have to stock them because they stock the straight romance novels?
I can't pretend to understand American politics, but wasn't the debate over whether gay people should be allowed to go into any store and buy the things available there - y'know, as though they were real people, with the same rights as straight people - rather than about dictating the items available in the shop?